PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGAG.L vs. ^SPLRCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LGAG.L vs. ^SPLRCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) and S&P 500 Consumer Staples Index (^SPLRCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LGAG.L is traded in GBp, while ^SPLRCS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^SPLRCS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGAG.L achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly higher than ^SPLRCS's 6.31% return.


LGAG.L

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.27%
YTD
8.78%
6M
9.30%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*

^SPLRCS

1D
1.13%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
6.31%
6M
4.30%
1Y
1.36%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*
6.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGAG.L vs. ^SPLRCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LGAG.L
L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF
8.78%12.56%6.20%-0.81%5.61%4.15%4.80%14.08%-22.77%
^SPLRCS
S&P 500 Consumer Staples Index
6.31%-5.90%13.94%-7.05%8.35%16.64%4.47%19.25%-9.15%

Correlation

The correlation between LGAG.L and ^SPLRCS is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2018

0.18

The correlation between LGAG.L and ^SPLRCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGAG.L vs. ^SPLRCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGAG.L
LGAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LGAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LGAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

^SPLRCS
^SPLRCS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
^SPLRCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SPLRCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SPLRCS Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
^SPLRCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SPLRCS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGAG.L vs. ^SPLRCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) and S&P 500 Consumer Staples Index (^SPLRCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGAG.L^SPLRCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.02

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

0.06

+2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

0.12

+6.84

LGAG.L vs. ^SPLRCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the ^SPLRCS Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGAG.L and ^SPLRCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGAG.L^SPLRCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

0.04

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.42

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.55

-0.39

Drawdowns

LGAG.L vs. ^SPLRCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGAG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.16%, which is greater than ^SPLRCS's maximum drawdown of -20.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGAG.L and ^SPLRCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGAG.L^SPLRCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.16%

-20.81%

-14.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-9.30%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.83%

-13.20%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.83%

-15.27%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-8.27%

+5.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-5.25%

-4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

4.39%

-1.92%

Volatility

LGAG.L vs. ^SPLRCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) is 3.98%, while S&P 500 Consumer Staples Index (^SPLRCS) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that LGAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^SPLRCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGAG.L^SPLRCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

5.05%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

11.30%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.11%

13.75%

-2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.57%

13.66%

+6.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

16.10%

+6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGAG.L and ^SPLRCS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGAG.L and ^SPLRCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer