LGAG.L vs. VDPG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L).
LGAG.L and VDPG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LGAG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Nov 7, 2018. VDPG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2019. Both LGAG.L and VDPG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
LGAG.L vs. VDPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LGAG.L vs. VDPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGAG.L L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 7.28% | 12.56% | 6.20% | -0.81% | 5.61% | 4.15% | 4.80% | -0.69% |
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 15.89% | 30.58% | -3.05% | 4.09% | -1.89% | 1.95% | 15.56% | 1.01% |
Different Trading Currencies
LGAG.L is traded in GBp, while VDPG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VDPG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGAG.L achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than VDPG.L's 15.89% return.
LGAG.L
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- —
VDPG.L
- 1D
- 4.28%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 23.90%
- 1Y
- 52.82%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGAG.L vs. VDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGAG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VDPG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
LGAG.L vs. VDPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGAG.L
VDPG.L
LGAG.L vs. VDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGAG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 2.81 | -1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 3.39 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.53 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.93 | -1.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | 15.12 | -6.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGAG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 2.81 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.54 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.52 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between LGAG.L and VDPG.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LGAG.L vs. VDPG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGAG.L nor VDPG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LGAG.L vs. VDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGAG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.16%, which is greater than VDPG.L's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGAG.L and VDPG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGAG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.16% | -30.11% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.82% | -13.45% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.83% | -17.64% | -7.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.43% | -9.75% | +5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.28% | -5.98% | -4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 3.49% | -1.01% |
Volatility
LGAG.L vs. VDPG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) is 4.60%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that LGAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LGAG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 9.09% | -4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 14.76% | -6.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.38% | 18.53% | -4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 15.02% | +5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 17.96% | +4.48% |