PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRD.L vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRD.L vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, VWRD.L has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 12.94%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.


VWRD.L

1D
2.38%
1M
0.88%
YTD
10.27%
6M
11.90%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
12.94%

XLP

1D
0.65%
1M
0.99%
YTD
11.10%
6M
9.54%
1Y
8.93%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
7.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRD.L vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
10.27%22.39%17.65%22.31%-18.19%18.52%16.13%25.67%-9.70%24.35%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
11.10%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRD.L and XLP is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between VWRD.L and XLP has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VWRD.L vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWRD.L
XLP

Technology

30.2%

-

Financial Services

16.1%

-

Industrials

10.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
1.0%

Communication Services

8.9%

-

Healthcare

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
99.0%

Energy

4.3%

-

Basic Materials

3.6%

-

Utilities

2.9%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Technology

VWRD.L
30.2%
XLP

-

Financial Services

VWRD.L
16.1%
XLP

-

Industrials

VWRD.L
10.2%
XLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

VWRD.L
9.1%
XLP
1.0%

Communication Services

VWRD.L
8.9%
XLP

-

Healthcare

VWRD.L
8.1%
XLP

-

Consumer Defensive

VWRD.L
4.9%
XLP
99.0%

Energy

VWRD.L
4.3%
XLP

-

Basic Materials

VWRD.L
3.6%
XLP

-

Utilities

VWRD.L
2.9%
XLP

-

Real Estate

VWRD.L
1.6%
XLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRD.L vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRD.L vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWRD.LXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.11

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

0.79

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

1.52

+10.36

VWRD.L vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRD.L and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWRD.L vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRD.LXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-35.90%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-9.69%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-12.39%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-16.30%

-9.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

-24.51%

-9.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-4.12%

+2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-7.06%

+2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

5.01%

-2.85%

Volatility

VWRD.L vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRD.LXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.53%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

10.14%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

12.90%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

13.34%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

14.75%

+0.98%

VWRD.L vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWRD.L vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than XLP's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.25%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.53%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRD.L and XLP have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.

VWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.08% for XLP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer