VWRD.L vs. XLP
VWRD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWRD.L returned 12.94%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for XLP. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VWRD.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
VWRD.L vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, VWRD.L has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 12.94%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.
VWRD.L
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
XLP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
VWRD.L vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 10.27% | 22.39% | 17.65% | 22.31% | -18.19% | 18.52% | 16.13% | 25.67% | -9.70% | 24.35% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 11.10% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWRD.L and XLP is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VWRD.L and XLP has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VWRD.L vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWRD.L
XLP
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWRD.L
XLP
-
Financial Services
VWRD.L
XLP
-
Industrials
VWRD.L
XLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
VWRD.L
XLP
Communication Services
VWRD.L
XLP
-
Healthcare
VWRD.L
XLP
-
Consumer Defensive
VWRD.L
XLP
Energy
VWRD.L
XLP
-
Basic Materials
VWRD.L
XLP
-
Utilities
VWRD.L
XLP
-
Real Estate
VWRD.L
XLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWRD.L vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
VWRD.L
XLP
VWRD.L vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWRD.L | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.11 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 0.79 | +2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 1.52 | +10.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWRD.L vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWRD.L | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.83% | -35.90% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.80% | -9.69% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.25% | -12.39% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.02% | -16.30% | -9.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.83% | -24.51% | -9.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -4.12% | +2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.51% | -7.06% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 5.01% | -2.85% |
Volatility
VWRD.L vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWRD.L | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 4.53% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 10.14% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.77% | 12.90% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 13.34% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 14.75% | +0.98% |
VWRD.L vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWRD.L vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than XLP's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 1.25% | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.88% | 2.29% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.07% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.53% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWRD.L and XLP have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.
VWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.08% for XLP.
Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer