PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRD.L vs. VHYD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRD.L vs. VHYD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly lower than VHYD.L's 11.63% return. Over the past 10 years, VWRD.L has outperformed VHYD.L with an annualized return of 13.22%, while VHYD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.74% annualized return.


VWRD.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
9.62%
6M
9.53%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
13.22%

VHYD.L

1D
0.78%
1M
0.68%
YTD
11.63%
6M
11.86%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRD.L vs. VHYD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
9.62%22.39%17.65%22.31%-18.19%18.52%16.13%25.67%-9.70%24.35%
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
11.63%27.03%9.32%11.43%-5.45%17.84%-0.31%20.75%-11.71%19.33%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRD.L and VHYD.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2013

0.91

The correlation between VWRD.L and VHYD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWRD.L vs. VHYD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWRD.L
VHYD.L

Technology

29.0%
9.5%

Financial Services

16.1%
28.2%

Industrials

11.0%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
7.2%

Communication Services

8.8%
3.4%

Healthcare

8.0%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
8.5%

Energy

4.2%
8.7%

Basic Materials

3.8%
5.2%

Utilities

2.7%
5.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.8%

Technology

VWRD.L
29.0%
VHYD.L
9.5%

Financial Services

VWRD.L
16.1%
VHYD.L
28.2%

Industrials

VWRD.L
11.0%
VHYD.L
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VWRD.L
9.4%
VHYD.L
7.2%

Communication Services

VWRD.L
8.8%
VHYD.L
3.4%

Healthcare

VWRD.L
8.0%
VHYD.L
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

VWRD.L
5.0%
VHYD.L
8.5%

Energy

VWRD.L
4.2%
VHYD.L
8.7%

Basic Materials

VWRD.L
3.8%
VHYD.L
5.2%

Utilities

VWRD.L
2.7%
VHYD.L
5.3%

Real Estate

VWRD.L
1.9%
VHYD.L
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRD.L vs. VHYD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VHYD.L
VHYD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRD.L vs. VHYD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWRD.LVHYD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.48

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

12.49

-1.21

VWRD.L vs. VHYD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRD.L and VHYD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWRD.L vs. VHYD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum VHYD.L drawdown of -36.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and VHYD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRD.LVHYD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-36.60%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-7.74%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-12.48%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-20.89%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

-36.60%

+2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-1.37%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-5.30%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.16%

+0.01%

Volatility

VWRD.L vs. VHYD.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) at 3.33%. This indicates that VWRD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRD.LVHYD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

3.33%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

8.81%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

10.80%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

13.65%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

15.27%

+0.38%

VWRD.L vs. VHYD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than VHYD.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWRD.L vs. VHYD.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than VHYD.L's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.55%2.77%3.15%3.31%3.72%3.14%2.90%3.23%3.77%2.96%3.16%3.32%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.29%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRD.L and VHYD.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYD.L.

VWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VHYD.L is Dividend. VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VHYD.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.29% for VHYD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and VHYD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer