VWRA.L vs. SSLN.L
VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - VWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWRA.L returned 10.91%/yr vs 19.02%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VWRA.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
VWRA.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VWRA.L is traded in USD, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWRA.L achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's -5.64% return.
VWRA.L
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- —
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 5.12%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -5.64%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 85.51%
- 3Y*
- 41.29%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.24%
VWRA.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 10.21% | 22.45% | 17.65% | 22.28% | -18.11% | 18.46% | 16.19% | 7.42% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -5.64% | 147.64% | 21.15% | -1.25% | 3.38% | -12.63% | 45.36% | 10.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWRA.L and SSLN.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2019 | 0.28 |
The correlation between VWRA.L and SSLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWRA.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
VWRA.L
SSLN.L
VWRA.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWRA.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 1.95 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 4.30 | +7.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWRA.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -83.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWRA.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.62% | -83.11% | +49.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -43.71% | +34.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -43.71% | +27.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.06% | -43.71% | +17.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -40.83% | +38.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -65.48% | +60.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 19.83% | -17.67% |
Volatility
VWRA.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) is 4.38%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 15.39%. This indicates that VWRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWRA.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 15.39% | -11.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 53.94% | -43.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 56.70% | -43.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 38.19% | -22.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 32.34% | -15.09% |
VWRA.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWRA.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWRA.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VWRA.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VWRA.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.
VWRA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SSLN.L is Silver. VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRA.L and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for VWRA.L and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer