PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly higher than WMT's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 7.65%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 18.44% annualized return.


VWO

1D
0.16%
1M
-4.67%
6M
3.57%
YTD
7.88%
1Y
17.74%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
7.65%
ALL TIME*
6.75%

WMT

1D
-1.79%
1M
-4.25%
6M
-5.89%
YTD
1.11%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
20.51%
10Y*
18.44%
ALL TIME*
18.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
7.88%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
1.11%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%23.32%30.16%-3.43%46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and WMT is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005

0.29

The correlation between VWO and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWOWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.16

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.01

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.36

2.88

+2.49

VWO vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWO vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-77.14%

+9.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-18.91%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-21.93%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.88%

-25.74%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-25.74%

-10.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.40%

-16.39%

+10.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.75%

-14.63%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

6.63%

-3.32%

Volatility

VWO vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 5.81%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

7.51%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.93%

19.19%

-4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

24.48%

-7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

21.88%

-4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

21.87%

-2.73%

Dividends

VWO vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than WMT's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.39%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.86%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and WMT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMT has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to VWO (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs WMT's -77.14%.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer