PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. VV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VWO having a 9.41% return and VV slightly higher at 9.78%. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed VV with an annualized return of 7.86%, while VV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


VWO

1D
0.96%
1M
-0.49%
6M
4.16%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
21.69%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
7.86%
ALL TIME*
6.81%

VV

1D
0.68%
1M
0.19%
6M
8.54%
YTD
9.78%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$85.99M$75.21M$96.89M
$386.61M$469.40M$499.89M

VWO vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
9.41%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
9.78%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and VV is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005

0.74

The correlation between VWO and VV shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWO vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
VV

Technology

34.2%
39.1%

Financial Services

19.4%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.0%

Industrials

7.9%
8.2%

Basic Materials

7.2%
1.7%

Communication Services

6.6%
9.7%

Energy

3.8%
3.0%

Healthcare

3.7%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.4%

Utilities

2.8%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.6%

Technology

VWO
34.2%
VV
39.1%

Financial Services

VWO
19.4%
VV
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
9.1%
VV
9.0%

Industrials

VWO
7.9%
VV
8.2%

Basic Materials

VWO
7.2%
VV
1.7%

Communication Services

VWO
6.6%
VV
9.7%

Energy

VWO
3.8%
VV
3.0%

Healthcare

VWO
3.7%
VV
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.3%
VV
4.4%

Utilities

VWO
2.8%
VV
2.5%

Real Estate

VWO
2.0%
VV
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VWO vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWOVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

2.07

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

8.71

-2.55

VWO vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the VV Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWO vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than VV's maximum drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and VV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-54.81%

-12.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-9.21%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-18.97%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.88%

-25.66%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-34.28%

-2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.07%

-1.53%

-2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.73%

-6.80%

-8.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.18%

+1.25%

Volatility

VWO vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 3.64%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

3.64%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

10.18%

+5.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

13.01%

+4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

17.35%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

18.21%

+0.96%

VWO vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWO vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than VV's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
1.02%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.35%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and VV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to VV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs VV's -54.81%.

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.14% vs 7.86% for VWO. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.02% for VV.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VV is Large Cap Blend Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.04% for VV.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and VV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer