PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. VIOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. VIOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly lower than VIOV's 15.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed VIOV with an annualized return of 8.85%, while VIOV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.


VWO

1D
-1.41%
1M
2.72%
YTD
12.22%
6M
13.79%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
8.85%

VIOV

1D
-1.28%
1M
2.26%
YTD
15.28%
6M
14.76%
1Y
37.06%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. VIOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
12.22%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
15.28%6.63%7.44%15.36%-11.37%30.67%2.81%24.44%-12.85%11.54%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and VIOV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.57

The correlation between VWO and VIOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWO vs. VIOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
VIOV

Technology

29.6%
10.6%

Financial Services

19.5%
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
15.4%

Industrials

8.0%
12.7%

Basic Materials

8.0%
6.3%

Communication Services

7.1%
3.4%

Energy

4.6%
9.1%

Healthcare

3.9%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.8%

Utilities

2.9%
1.9%

Real Estate

2.2%
8.8%

Technology

VWO
29.6%
VIOV
10.6%

Financial Services

VWO
19.5%
VIOV
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
10.7%
VIOV
15.4%

Industrials

VWO
8.0%
VIOV
12.7%

Basic Materials

VWO
8.0%
VIOV
6.3%

Communication Services

VWO
7.1%
VIOV
3.4%

Energy

VWO
4.6%
VIOV
9.1%

Healthcare

VWO
3.9%
VIOV
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.7%
VIOV
3.8%

Utilities

VWO
2.9%
VIOV
1.9%

Real Estate

VWO
2.2%
VIOV
8.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. VIOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VIOV
VIOV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VIOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. VIOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWOVIOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.99

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

13.00

-3.04

VWO vs. VIOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the VIOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and VIOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWOVIOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.03

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.26

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.43

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.53

-0.26

Drawdowns

VWO vs. VIOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than VIOV's maximum drawdown of -47.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and VIOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOVIOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-47.36%

-20.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-9.33%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-28.44%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.64%

-28.44%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-47.36%

+10.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-1.28%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-7.38%

-8.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.86%

+0.23%

Volatility

VWO vs. VIOV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) at 4.54%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOVIOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

4.54%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

11.57%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

18.41%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

21.95%

-4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

23.89%

-4.69%

VWO vs. VIOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VIOV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWO vs. VIOV - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than VIOV's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
1.59%1.69%1.78%2.18%1.81%1.59%1.42%1.60%1.76%1.43%1.17%1.32%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.40%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and VIOV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to VIOV (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs VIOV's -47.36%.

On 10-year performance, VIOV leads with 10.23% vs 8.85% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VIOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIOV has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VIOV.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.59% for VIOV.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VIOV is Small Cap Value Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while VIOV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.10% for VIOV.

VIOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and VIOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer