VWO vs. QTUM
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWO returned 5.83%/yr vs 29.16%/yr for QTUM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
VWO vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 53.56% return.
VWO
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 13.17%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
QTUM
- 1D
- 4.18%
- 1M
- 17.45%
- YTD
- 53.56%
- 6M
- 53.19%
- 1Y
- 94.08%
- 3Y*
- 50.50%
- 5Y*
- 29.16%
- 10Y*
- —
VWO vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 13.17% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -5.58% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.56% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and QTUM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between VWO and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
VWO vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
QTUM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Energy
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWO
QTUM
Financial Services
VWO
QTUM
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
QTUM
Industrials
VWO
QTUM
Basic Materials
VWO
QTUM
-
Communication Services
VWO
QTUM
Energy
VWO
QTUM
-
Healthcare
VWO
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
VWO
QTUM
-
Utilities
VWO
QTUM
-
Real Estate
VWO
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
QTUM
VWO vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.51 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 6.20 | -3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 22.43 | -13.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWO vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -38.45% | -29.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -15.26% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -25.39% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -38.45% | +5.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -0.42% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -8.24% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 4.21% | -1.05% |
Volatility
VWO vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 6.98%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 14.65%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.98% | 14.65% | -7.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 23.48% | -9.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.62% | 28.64% | -12.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 27.06% | -9.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 27.43% | -8.19% |
VWO vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWO vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than QTUM's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.38% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and QTUM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to VWO (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.16% vs 5.83% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.16% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.70% for QTUM.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer