VWO vs. MINV

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and MINV (Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while MINV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews. VWO is passively managed, while MINV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VWO returned 16.61%/yr vs 31.39%/yr for MINV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for MINV.

Performance

VWO vs. MINV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than MINV's 51.67% return.

VWO

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -0.68%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: 26.52%
• 3Y*: 16.61%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 9.00%

MINV

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 51.67%
• 6M: 53.62%
• 1Y: 81.42%
• 3Y*: 31.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. MINV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	10.77%	25.60%	10.59%	9.25%	-0.22%
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF	51.67%	30.85%	17.32%	-2.66%	-2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and MINV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.89

The correlation between VWO and MINV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWO vs. MINV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VWO	MINV
Technology	29.6%	67.2%
Financial Services	19.5%	1.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	3.7%
Industrials	8.0%	19.2%
Basic Materials	8.0%	0.8%
Communication Services	7.1%	2.3%
Energy	4.6%	1.7%
Healthcare	3.9%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	-
Utilities	2.9%	-
Real Estate	2.2%	-

Return for Risk

VWO vs. MINV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO

VWO Risk / Return Rank: 50
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

MINV

MINV Risk / Return Rank: 91
MINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
MINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
MINV Omega Ratio Rank: 90
MINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
MINV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. MINV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VWO	MINV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.92	-1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	3.53	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.51	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	7.23	-5.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.80	18.28	-10.47

VWO vs. MINV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the MINV Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and MINV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VWO vs. MINV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than MINV's maximum drawdown of -23.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and MINV.

Drawdown Indicators

	VWO	MINV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.68%	-23.49%	-44.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-10.91%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.37%	-19.82%	+2.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.68%	-6.24%	+3.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-8.06%	-7.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	4.31%	-1.14%

Volatility

VWO vs. MINV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 6.64%, while Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) has a volatility of 13.99%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VWO	MINV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.64%	13.99%	-7.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.04%	23.75%	-9.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.54%	27.05%	-10.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	24.22%	-6.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.22%	24.22%	-5.00%

VWO vs. MINV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MINV's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

VWO vs. MINV - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than MINV's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF	1.00%	1.51%	0.25%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	2.44%	2.79%	3.20%	3.52%	4.11%	2.63%	1.91%	3.23%	2.88%	2.30%	2.52%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VWO and MINV in my portfolio?

VWO and MINV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VWO or MINV?

MINV has higher volatility (13.99%) compared to VWO (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs MINV's -23.49%.

Which ETF is better, VWO or MINV?

On 3-year performance, MINV leads with 31.39% vs 16.61% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VWO or MINV?

Over the 3-year period, MINV has performed better with a 31.39% return vs 16.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VWO or MINV?

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MINV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VWO or MINV?

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.00% for MINV.

What is the main difference between VWO and MINV?

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MINV is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.79% for MINV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.