PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINV vs. ADVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MINV vs. ADVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) and Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MINV vs. ADVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MINV
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
7.75%30.85%17.32%5.56%
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
6.57%26.12%7.02%5.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINV achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly higher than ADVE's 6.57% return.


MINV

1D
2.27%
1M
-7.80%
YTD
7.75%
6M
4.06%
1Y
38.07%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
10Y*

ADVE

1D
3.40%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
6.57%
6M
10.65%
1Y
32.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MINV vs. ADVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MINV and ADVE have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

MINV vs. ADVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINV
MINV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ADVE
ADVE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ADVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINV vs. ADVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) and Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MINVADVEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

1.86

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

2.51

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.75

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.23

10.93

-2.71

MINV vs. ADVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINV Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the ADVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINV and ADVE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MINVADVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.86

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.19

-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between MINV and ADVE is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MINV vs. ADVE - Dividend Comparison

MINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than ADVE's 2.80% yield.


TTM202520242023
MINV
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
1.40%1.51%0.25%1.00%
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
2.80%2.97%6.00%0.37%

Drawdowns

MINV vs. ADVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINV drawdown since its inception was -23.49%, which is greater than ADVE's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV and ADVE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MINVADVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.49%

-18.41%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-11.73%

-2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

-8.73%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-3.20%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

2.95%

+1.54%

Volatility

MINV vs. ADVE - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) has a higher volatility of 11.61% compared to Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) at 8.77%. This indicates that MINV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MINVADVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.61%

8.77%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.15%

12.93%

+5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.14%

17.59%

+6.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.95%

15.11%

+7.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.95%

15.11%

+7.84%