VWO vs. MACMX
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and MACMX (BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund) are both funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while MACMX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 9.00%/yr vs 2.45%/yr for MACMX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for MACMX.
Performance
VWO vs. MACMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than MACMX's 1.79% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has outperformed MACMX with an annualized return of 9.00%, while MACMX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
MACMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 6.19%
- 3Y*
- 4.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.27%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
VWO vs. MACMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 10.77% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
MACMX BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund | 1.79% | 4.41% | 3.91% | 4.96% | -8.76% | 4.70% | 1.45% | 6.81% | 1.26% | 7.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and MACMX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | -0.05 |
The correlation between VWO and MACMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. MACMX — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
MACMX
VWO vs. MACMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund (MACMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWO | MACMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.50 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.53 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 8.37 | -0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWO vs. MACMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than MACMX's maximum drawdown of -13.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and MACMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | MACMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -13.65% | -54.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -2.50% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -5.24% | -12.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -13.65% | -18.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -13.65% | -22.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -0.17% | -2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -1.94% | -13.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 0.75% | +2.42% |
Volatility
VWO vs. MACMX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund (MACMX) at 1.08%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MACMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | MACMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 1.08% | +5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 2.06% | +11.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 2.89% | +13.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 4.20% | +13.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 4.07% | +15.15% |
VWO vs. MACMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MACMX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWO vs. MACMX - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than MACMX's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MACMX BlackRock California Municipal Opportunities Fund | 3.68% | 4.77% | 3.93% | 2.68% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 2.02% | 2.74% | 4.60% | 3.19% | 2.82% | 3.43% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.44% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and MACMX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to MACMX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs MACMX's -13.65%.
MACMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and MACMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer