VWO vs. IXG
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while IXG is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Financials Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 9.00%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for IXG. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXG.
Performance
VWO vs. IXG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than IXG's 3.78% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed IXG with an annualized return of 9.00%, while IXG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
IXG
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 19.03%
- 3Y*
- 23.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
VWO vs. IXG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 10.77% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 3.78% | 28.54% | 25.69% | 14.97% | -8.97% | 25.07% | -2.99% | 24.60% | -16.33% | 23.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and IXG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.72 |
The correlation between VWO and IXG shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VWO vs. IXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
IXG
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWO
IXG
Financial Services
VWO
IXG
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
IXG
Industrials
VWO
IXG
Basic Materials
VWO
IXG
-
Communication Services
VWO
IXG
-
Energy
VWO
IXG
Healthcare
VWO
IXG
Consumer Defensive
VWO
IXG
-
Utilities
VWO
IXG
-
Real Estate
VWO
IXG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. IXG — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
IXG
VWO vs. IXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWO | IXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.21 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.49 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 5.26 | +2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWO vs. IXG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, smaller than the maximum IXG drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and IXG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | IXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -78.42% | +10.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -11.33% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -13.54% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -27.20% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -43.47% | +7.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | 0.00% | -2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -19.73% | +3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 3.21% | -0.04% |
Volatility
VWO vs. IXG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) at 4.30%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | IXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 4.30% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 11.30% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 14.01% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 17.38% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 20.12% | -0.90% |
VWO vs. IXG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IXG's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWO vs. IXG - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than IXG's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 1.97% | 2.04% | 2.64% | 2.62% | 3.71% | 1.69% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.12% | 2.21% | 2.79% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.44% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and IXG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to IXG (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs IXG's -78.42%.
On 10-year performance, IXG leads with 12.87% vs 9.00% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IXG has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXG has performed better with a 12.87% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXG.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.97% for IXG.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IXG is Financials Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while IXG tracks S&P Global Financials Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.46% for IXG.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and IXG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer