VWO vs. AMLP
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 8.88%/yr vs 6.85%/yr for AMLP. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.
Performance
VWO vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 15.69% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 8.88%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.85% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- 15.69%
- 6M
- 14.93%
- 1Y
- 15.89%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.34%
- 10Y*
- 6.85%
VWO vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 9.93% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 15.69% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and AMLP is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010 | 0.39 |
The correlation between VWO and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VWO vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
AMLP
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWO
AMLP
-
Financial Services
VWO
AMLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
AMLP
-
Industrials
VWO
AMLP
-
Basic Materials
VWO
AMLP
-
Communication Services
VWO
AMLP
-
Energy
VWO
AMLP
Healthcare
VWO
AMLP
-
Consumer Defensive
VWO
AMLP
-
Utilities
VWO
AMLP
Real Estate
VWO
AMLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
AMLP
VWO vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWO | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 1.78 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 5.78 | +1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWO vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -77.19% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -8.94% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -14.27% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -20.92% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -72.62% | +36.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -4.61% | +1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.81% | -17.38% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.75% | +0.41% |
Volatility
VWO vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 4.71%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 4.71% | +1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 8.76% | +5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 11.84% | +4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 19.95% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 27.67% | -8.44% |
VWO vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWO vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than AMLP's 7.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.68% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.45% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and AMLP have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to AMLP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
On 10-year performance, VWO leads with 8.88% vs 6.85% for AMLP. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VWO has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 6.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.68%, compared with 2.45% for VWO.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AMLP is MLPs. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.90% for AMLP.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer