PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVSGX vs. RYWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVSGX vs. RYWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVSGX achieves a 17.05% return, which is significantly lower than RYWCX's 27.37% return.


VVSGX

1D
0.85%
1M
4.66%
YTD
17.05%
6M
13.65%
1Y
26.79%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*

RYWCX

1D
1.19%
1M
7.32%
YTD
27.37%
6M
23.10%
1Y
38.73%
3Y*
18.04%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
8.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVSGX vs. RYWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VVSGX
VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund
17.05%8.99%10.85%14.20%-32.21%-3.59%
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
27.37%7.76%7.20%17.03%-30.33%1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between VVSGX and RYWCX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021

0.91

The correlation between VVSGX and RYWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVSGX vs. RYWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVSGX
VVSGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VVSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VVSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

RYWCX
RYWCX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RYWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
RYWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVSGX vs. RYWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVSGXRYWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

4.40

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

14.54

-6.88

VVSGX vs. RYWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the RYWCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVSGX and RYWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VVSGX vs. RYWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVSGX drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, smaller than the maximum RYWCX drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVSGX and RYWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVSGXRYWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.74%

-60.64%

+15.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-8.49%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-26.39%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.74%

-40.28%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

0.00%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.57%

-13.41%

-11.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.57%

+0.75%

Volatility

VVSGX vs. RYWCX - Volatility Comparison

VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) at 5.61%. This indicates that VVSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVSGXRYWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

5.61%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.06%

13.95%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.86%

18.74%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.11%

22.93%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

24.72%

+0.34%

VVSGX vs. RYWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVSGX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than RYWCX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

VVSGX vs. RYWCX - Dividend Comparison

VVSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while RYWCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.52%0.00%0.00%59.93%0.00%0.00%9.26%3.92%
VVSGX
VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund
2.12%0.00%0.00%7.74%10.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VVSGX and RYWCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VVSGX has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to RYWCX (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VVSGX dropped -44.74% vs RYWCX's -60.64%.

RYWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVSGX and RYWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer