VV vs. SGRT
VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. VV is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
VV vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
VV
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VV vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 10.69% | 7.51% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between VV and SGRT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VV vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
VV
SGRT
VV vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VV | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VV | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 3.81 | -3.21 |
Drawdowns
VV vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VV | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -17.87% | -36.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | 0.00% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -3.11% | -3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | — | — |
Volatility
VV vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VV | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 33.41% | -21.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 33.41% | -16.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 33.41% | -15.22% |
VV vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
VV vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VV and SGRT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for VV and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer