PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VV vs. SELV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VV vs. SELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly higher than SELV's 4.65% return.


VV

1D
-0.77%
1M
1.34%
6M
8.23%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
21.28%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
15.17%

SELV

1D
0.81%
1M
1.85%
6M
3.60%
YTD
4.65%
1Y
10.70%
3Y*
11.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VV vs. SELV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.23%18.11%25.25%27.18%-5.37%
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
4.65%12.86%14.71%6.58%-0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between VV and SELV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between VV and SELV has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VV vs. SELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VV
SELV

Technology

39.5%
21.4%

Financial Services

11.0%
4.8%

Communication Services

10.8%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
4.9%

Healthcare

8.4%
17.0%

Industrials

7.9%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
12.3%

Energy

3.2%
4.3%

Utilities

2.0%
7.6%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.5%
2.8%

Technology

VV
39.5%
SELV
21.4%

Financial Services

VV
11.0%
SELV
4.8%

Communication Services

VV
10.8%
SELV
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VV
9.7%
SELV
4.9%

Healthcare

VV
8.4%
SELV
17.0%

Industrials

VV
7.9%
SELV
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

VV
4.4%
SELV
12.3%

Energy

VV
3.2%
SELV
4.3%

Utilities

VV
2.0%
SELV
7.6%

Real Estate

VV
1.6%
SELV
0.1%

Basic Materials

VV
1.5%
SELV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VV vs. SELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SELV
SELV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SELV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SELV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VV vs. SELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVSELVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.81

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

4.84

+5.16

VV vs. SELV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VV Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the SELV Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VV and SELV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VV vs. SELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than SELV's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and SELV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVSELVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-13.73%

-41.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-5.92%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-8.94%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.34%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-2.37%

-4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.21%

-0.08%

Volatility

VV vs. SELV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) at 3.86%. This indicates that VV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVSELVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

3.86%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

7.24%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

9.26%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

11.90%

+5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

11.90%

+6.29%

VV vs. SELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SELV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VV vs. SELV - Dividend Comparison

VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SELV's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
1.71%1.74%1.77%2.06%1.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
1.02%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


VV and SELV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to SELV (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs SELV's -13.73%.

On 3-year performance, VV leads with 20.34% vs 11.44% for SELV. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SELV has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VV has performed better with a 20.34% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SELV.

SELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.02% for VV.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.15% for SELV.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VV and SELV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer