VV vs. MTUM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VV returned 15.62%/yr vs 17.49%/yr for MTUM. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.

Performance

VV vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 32.00% return. Over the past 10 years, VV has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 15.62%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.49% annualized return.

VV

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: 7.90%
• 6M: 6.95%
• 1Y: 23.37%
• 3Y*: 21.00%
• 5Y*: 12.65%
• 10Y*: 15.62%

MTUM

• 1D: -4.48%
• 1M: 8.74%
• YTD: 32.00%
• 6M: 29.92%
• 1Y: 41.78%
• 3Y*: 33.87%
• 5Y*: 15.18%
• 10Y*: 17.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VV vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	7.90%	18.11%	25.25%	27.18%	-19.91%	27.41%	21.04%	31.25%	-4.46%	22.00%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	32.00%	22.15%	32.89%	9.15%	-18.27%	13.36%	29.86%	27.25%	-1.67%	37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VV and MTUM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013	0.87

The correlation between VV and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

VV vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VV	MTUM
Technology	35.9%	50.2%
Financial Services	11.8%	5.0%
Communication Services	11.2%	5.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	2.9%
Healthcare	8.6%	3.5%
Industrials	8.0%	15.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	3.7%
Energy	3.6%	10.5%
Utilities	2.7%	0.6%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.3%
Basic Materials	1.6%	2.3%

Return for Risk

VV vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VV

VV Risk / Return Rank: 57
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 65

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 64
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VV vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VV	MTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.92	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.53	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.35	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	3.64	-1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.23	13.91	-2.68

VV vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VV Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VV and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VV vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and MTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VV	MTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.81%	-34.08%	-20.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.21%	-11.54%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.97%	-20.99%	+2.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.66%	-32.28%	+6.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.28%	-34.08%	-0.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.21%	-4.48%	+1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.83%	-6.19%	-0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	3.01%	-0.92%

Volatility

VV vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) is 4.94%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that VV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VV	MTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	12.20%	-7.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.93%	19.44%	-9.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.66%	21.93%	-9.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.33%	21.15%	-3.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.21%	21.31%	-3.10%

VV vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VV vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than MTUM's 0.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.56%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	1.00%	1.08%	1.24%	1.41%	1.66%	1.19%	1.46%	1.81%	2.09%	1.75%	1.98%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VV and MTUM in my portfolio?

VV and MTUM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VV or MTUM?

MTUM has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to VV (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

Which ETF is better, VV or MTUM?

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.49% vs 15.62% for VV. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VV or MTUM?

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.49% return vs 15.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VV or MTUM?

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VV or MTUM?

VV has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.56% for MTUM.

What is the main difference between VV and MTUM?

VV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.15% for MTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.