PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VV vs. DLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VV vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, VV has outperformed DLN with an annualized return of 15.58%, while DLN has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return.


VV

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.69%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
15.58%

DLN

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.93%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.96%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VV vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.69%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
9.93%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%4.59%28.91%-5.82%18.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VV and DLN is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006

0.92

The correlation between VV and DLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VV vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VV
DLN

Technology

35.9%
20.1%

Financial Services

11.8%
18.0%

Communication Services

11.2%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
5.0%

Healthcare

8.6%
12.6%

Industrials

8.0%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
9.3%

Energy

3.6%
8.5%

Utilities

2.7%
5.9%

Real Estate

1.7%
4.0%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.0%

Technology

VV
35.9%
DLN
20.1%

Financial Services

VV
11.8%
DLN
18.0%

Communication Services

VV
11.2%
DLN
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VV
9.8%
DLN
5.0%

Healthcare

VV
8.6%
DLN
12.6%

Industrials

VV
8.0%
DLN
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

VV
4.8%
DLN
9.3%

Energy

VV
3.6%
DLN
8.5%

Utilities

VV
2.7%
DLN
5.9%

Real Estate

VV
1.7%
DLN
4.0%

Basic Materials

VV
1.6%
DLN
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VV vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VV vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VVDLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.69

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.86

15.59

-1.73

VV vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VV Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VV and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VVDLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.53

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.93

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.79

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.53

+0.06

Drawdowns

VV vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and DLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVDLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-57.84%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-6.10%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-13.71%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-16.26%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

-35.82%

+1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.51%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-7.52%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.44%

+0.57%

Volatility

VV vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that VV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVDLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.17%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

6.77%

+2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

8.87%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

13.26%

+3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

16.16%

+2.03%

VV vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

VV vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
1.79%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.98%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


VV and DLN have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VV has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs DLN's -57.84%.

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.58% vs 12.68% for DLN. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DLN.

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.98% for VV.

VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.28% for DLN.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VV and DLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer