VUSG vs. QUS
VUSG (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. VUSG is actively managed, while QUS is passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUSG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
VUSG vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUSG achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than QUS's 5.96% return.
VUSG
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 4.89%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
VUSG vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VUSG Vanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETF | 1.35% | 2.62% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 5.96% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUSG and QUS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUSG vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
VUSG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QUS
VUSG vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETF (VUSG) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUSG | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUSG vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUSG drawdown since its inception was -15.14%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSG and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUSG | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.14% | -33.78% | +18.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.86% | -1.69% | -6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -3.69% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
VUSG vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUSG | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 9.16% | +10.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 14.34% | +5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 16.43% | +3.59% |
VUSG vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUSG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
VUSG vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
VUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than QUS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.32% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
VUSG Vanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUSG and QUS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VUSG.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.02% for VUSG.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VUSG and 0.15% for QUS.
Find the right allocation for VUSG and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer