PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUSG vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUSG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETF (VUSG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUSG achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 7.66% return.


VUSG

1D
-1.11%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
1.35%
6M
0.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.02%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
7.66%
6M
6.35%
1Y
21.50%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUSG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VUSG and BBUS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUSG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUSG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUSG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETF (VUSG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VUSGBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

VUSG vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VUSG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUSG drawdown since its inception was -15.14%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSG and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUSGBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.14%

-35.35%

+20.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.86%

-3.39%

-4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-5.43%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

Volatility

VUSG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUSGBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

12.48%

+7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.02%

17.13%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.02%

19.58%

+0.44%

VUSG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUSG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

VUSG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

VUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than BBUS's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.03%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
VUSG
Vanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETF
0.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VUSG and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VUSG.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.02% for VUSG.

VUSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VUSG and 0.02% for BBUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUSG and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer