VUS vs. DFND
VUS (Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. VUS is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. VUS charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
VUS vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VUS
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 17.26%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -0.25%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
VUS vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VUS Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF | 17.26% | 0.88% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | -0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUS and DFND is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | -0.00 |
VUS vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUS
DFND
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Technology
VUS
DFND
Real Estate
VUS
DFND
Industrials
VUS
DFND
Financial Services
VUS
DFND
Healthcare
VUS
DFND
Energy
VUS
DFND
Communication Services
VUS
DFND
Consumer Cyclical
VUS
DFND
Basic Materials
VUS
DFND
Consumer Defensive
VUS
DFND
Utilities
VUS
DFND
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUS vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF (VUS) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.05 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUS vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUS drawdown since its inception was -9.45%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUS and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -22.65% | +13.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -3.69% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -5.70% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility
VUS vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 10.88% | +4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 22.44% | -7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 19.08% | -3.96% |
VUS vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
VUS vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
VUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.29% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
VUS Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUS and DFND have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
VUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.29% for DFND.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VUS and 1.50% for DFND.
Find the right allocation for VUS and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer