PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUAA.L vs. EIMI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUAA.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUAA.L achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 24.25% return.


VUAA.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
2.12%
YTD
9.14%
6M
9.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EIMI.L

1D
-1.30%
1M
4.51%
YTD
24.25%
6M
27.21%
1Y
49.41%
3Y*
23.30%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
10.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAA.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VUAA.L and EIMI.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.73

VUAA.L vs. EIMI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUAA.L
EIMI.L

Technology

35.7%
35.0%

Financial Services

11.6%
18.4%

Communication Services

11.3%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
3.7%

Industrials

8.3%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.3%

Energy

3.5%
3.9%

Utilities

2.4%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
6.9%

Technology

VUAA.L
35.7%
EIMI.L
35.0%

Financial Services

VUAA.L
11.6%
EIMI.L
18.4%

Communication Services

VUAA.L
11.3%
EIMI.L
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VUAA.L
10.2%
EIMI.L
9.6%

Healthcare

VUAA.L
8.5%
EIMI.L
3.7%

Industrials

VUAA.L
8.3%
EIMI.L
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

VUAA.L
4.9%
EIMI.L
3.3%

Energy

VUAA.L
3.5%
EIMI.L
3.9%

Utilities

VUAA.L
2.4%
EIMI.L
2.2%

Real Estate

VUAA.L
1.9%
EIMI.L
1.7%

Basic Materials

VUAA.L
1.8%
EIMI.L
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUAA.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAA.L

EIMI.L
EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAA.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VUAA.L vs. EIMI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUAA.LEIMI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

0.36

+1.87

Drawdowns

VUAA.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -8.18%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and EIMI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUAA.LEIMI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-38.73%

+30.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-2.64%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.11%

-14.04%

+12.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

3.52%

-1.61%

Volatility

VUAA.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUAA.LEIMI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.79%

19.23%

-7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.79%

18.31%

-6.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.79%

19.15%

-7.36%

VUAA.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUAA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUAA.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUAA.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VUAA.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EIMI.L.

VUAA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAA.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUAA.L and EIMI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer