PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWG vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWG vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWG achieves a 16.90% return, which is significantly higher than VOOG's 13.78% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWG has underperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 11.33%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.


VTWG

1D
-1.35%
1M
4.49%
YTD
16.90%
6M
15.29%
1Y
37.62%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
11.33%

VOOG

1D
-0.93%
1M
7.44%
YTD
13.78%
6M
13.58%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
28.13%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWG vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
16.90%13.07%15.15%18.90%-26.49%2.84%34.72%28.75%-9.45%22.27%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.78%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWG and VOOG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.78

The correlation between VTWG and VOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWG vs. VOOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWG
VOOG

Technology

23.5%
49.4%

Industrials

23.1%
6.2%

Healthcare

22.4%
5.8%

Financial Services

8.2%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
9.4%

Basic Materials

4.2%
0.4%

Energy

3.5%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
1.0%

Communication Services

2.2%
18.0%

Real Estate

2.1%
0.6%

Utilities

0.7%
0.4%

Technology

VTWG
23.5%
VOOG
49.4%

Industrials

VTWG
23.1%
VOOG
6.2%

Healthcare

VTWG
22.4%
VOOG
5.8%

Financial Services

VTWG
8.2%
VOOG
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWG
7.7%
VOOG
9.4%

Basic Materials

VTWG
4.2%
VOOG
0.4%

Energy

VTWG
3.5%
VOOG
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

VTWG
2.6%
VOOG
1.0%

Communication Services

VTWG
2.2%
VOOG
18.0%

Real Estate

VTWG
2.1%
VOOG
0.6%

Utilities

VTWG
0.7%
VOOG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWG vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWG
VTWG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VTWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWG vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTWGVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.49

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

10.32

-1.15

VTWG vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWG Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWG and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTWGVOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.16

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.76

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.88

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.91

-0.39

Drawdowns

VTWG vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWG drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWG and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWGVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-32.73%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

-13.71%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.58%

-22.18%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-32.73%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-32.73%

-9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-1.08%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.53%

-4.97%

-5.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

3.31%

+0.81%

Volatility

VTWG vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) at 4.32%. This indicates that VTWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWGVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

4.32%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

12.41%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.50%

15.85%

+5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.52%

21.19%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.21%

20.73%

+3.48%

VTWG vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWG vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

VTWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than VOOG's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.44%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.59%0.64%0.55%0.79%0.71%0.54%0.48%0.72%0.72%0.64%0.96%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWG and VOOG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTWG has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to VOOG (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWG dropped -42.07% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 18.15% vs 11.33% for VTWG. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 11.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VTWG.

VTWG has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.44% for VOOG.

VTWG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VOOG is S&P 500. VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VTWG and 0.07% for VOOG.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWG and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer