VTV vs. XOVR
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and XOVR (ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the ER30TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VTV returned 11.76%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for XOVR. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XOVR.
Performance
VTV vs. XOVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than XOVR's -0.89% return.
VTV
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 26.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
XOVR
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.78%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 8.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- —
VTV vs. XOVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 14.29% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 4.86% |
XOVR ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF | -0.89% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -5.02% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and XOVR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017 | 0.52 |
The correlation between VTV and XOVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VTV vs. XOVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
XOVR
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VTV
XOVR
Healthcare
VTV
XOVR
Industrials
VTV
XOVR
Technology
VTV
XOVR
Consumer Defensive
VTV
XOVR
-
Energy
VTV
XOVR
Utilities
VTV
XOVR
-
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
XOVR
Communication Services
VTV
XOVR
Basic Materials
VTV
XOVR
-
Real Estate
VTV
XOVR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. XOVR — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
XOVR
VTV vs. XOVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTV | XOVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.09 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 0.37 | +3.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.04 | 0.81 | +15.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTV vs. XOVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than XOVR's maximum drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and XOVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | XOVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -56.28% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -24.32% | +17.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -25.23% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -49.35% | +32.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.06% | +8.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -18.37% | +10.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 11.02% | -9.34% |
Volatility
VTV vs. XOVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 3.34%, while ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | XOVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 8.27% | -4.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.82% | 16.23% | -8.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.38% | 21.11% | -10.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 26.31% | -12.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 26.93% | -10.25% |
VTV vs. XOVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XOVR's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTV vs. XOVR - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
XOVR ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and XOVR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOVR has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to VTV (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs XOVR's -56.28%.
On 5-year performance, VTV leads with 11.76% vs 5.40% for XOVR. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTV has performed better with a 11.76% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while XOVR is Large Cap Growth Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while XOVR tracks ER30TR Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and EntrepreneurShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.75% for XOVR.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and XOVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer