PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. VIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. VIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VTV having a 16.37% return and VIS slightly lower at 15.98%. Over the past 10 years, VTV has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 12.57%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.86% annualized return.


VTV

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.18%
6M
11.27%
YTD
16.37%
1Y
26.83%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
12.57%
ALL TIME*
9.67%

VIS

1D
0.72%
1M
-3.24%
6M
8.07%
YTD
15.98%
1Y
19.96%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
13.86%
ALL TIME*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.93M$23.95M$29.49M
$688.19M$688.42M$619.05M

VTV vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
16.37%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
15.98%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and VIS is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004

0.88

The correlation between VTV and VIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTV vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTV
VIS

Financial Services

22.4%
0.2%

Technology

15.3%
5.5%

Healthcare

15.2%
0.0%

Industrials

14.3%
93.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%

-

Energy

6.9%
0.5%

Utilities

4.8%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
0.9%

Basic Materials

3.0%
0.2%

Communication Services

2.9%
0.0%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.0%

Financial Services

VTV
22.4%
VIS
0.2%

Technology

VTV
15.3%
VIS
5.5%

Healthcare

VTV
15.2%
VIS
0.0%

Industrials

VTV
14.3%
VIS
93.2%

Consumer Defensive

VTV
8.7%
VIS

-

Energy

VTV
6.9%
VIS
0.5%

Utilities

VTV
4.8%
VIS
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VTV
3.9%
VIS
0.9%

Basic Materials

VTV
3.0%
VIS
0.2%

Communication Services

VTV
2.9%
VIS
0.0%

Real Estate

VTV
2.5%
VIS
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTV vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTVVISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.20

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

1.63

+2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.42

6.48

+9.95

VTV vs. VIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the VIS Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and VIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTV vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and VIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVVISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-63.51%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-12.29%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-20.80%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-22.96%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

-42.42%

+5.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-4.42%

+3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-8.33%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

3.09%

-1.45%

Volatility

VTV vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.62%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVVISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

5.07%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

14.66%

-6.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

17.97%

-7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

18.55%

-4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

20.48%

-3.87%

VTV vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VIS's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTV vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than VIS's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.90%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and VIS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIS has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to VTV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs VIS's -63.51%.

On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 13.86% vs 12.57% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 13.86% return vs 12.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VIS.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.90% for VIS.

VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VIS is Industrials Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.09% for VIS.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and VIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer