PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. RPV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. RPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly higher than RPV's 10.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed RPV with an annualized return of 12.48%, while RPV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.64% annualized return.


VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%

RPV

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.84%
YTD
10.48%
6M
12.73%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTV vs. RPV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%
RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
10.48%17.70%12.41%7.98%-1.27%34.22%-8.69%24.80%-12.31%17.30%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and RPV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2006

0.89

The correlation between VTV and RPV shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTV vs. RPV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTV
RPV

Financial Services

22.3%
17.9%

Healthcare

14.5%
16.2%

Industrials

14.0%
6.3%

Technology

13.4%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
15.2%

Energy

8.1%
11.3%

Utilities

5.2%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
10.2%

Communication Services

3.3%
5.7%

Basic Materials

3.1%
9.0%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.4%

Financial Services

VTV
22.3%
RPV
17.9%

Healthcare

VTV
14.5%
RPV
16.2%

Industrials

VTV
14.0%
RPV
6.3%

Technology

VTV
13.4%
RPV
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

VTV
9.4%
RPV
15.2%

Energy

VTV
8.1%
RPV
11.3%

Utilities

VTV
5.2%
RPV
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VTV
4.0%
RPV
10.2%

Communication Services

VTV
3.3%
RPV
5.7%

Basic Materials

VTV
3.1%
RPV
9.0%

Real Estate

VTV
2.8%
RPV
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. RPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

RPV
RPV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTV vs. RPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTVRPVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.38

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

3.56

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.69

12.45

+3.24

VTV vs. RPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the RPV Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and RPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTVRPVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.19

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.52

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.49

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.38

+0.14

Drawdowns

VTV vs. RPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum RPV drawdown of -75.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and RPV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVRPVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-75.32%

+16.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-7.74%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-15.50%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-22.64%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

-50.67%

+13.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-10.69%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.21%

-0.53%

Volatility

VTV vs. RPV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) have volatilities of 2.52% and 2.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVRPVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.54%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

8.50%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.11%

12.63%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

17.88%

-4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

21.92%

-5.25%

VTV vs. RPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RPV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTV vs. RPV - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than RPV's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
2.28%2.50%2.16%2.38%2.29%1.92%2.11%2.28%2.49%1.73%1.73%2.39%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and RPV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPV has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs RPV's -75.32%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 10.64% for RPV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPV.

RPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.

VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while RPV tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.35% for RPV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and RPV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer