VTV vs. IUSG
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while IUSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.78%/yr vs 17.63%/yr for IUSG. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
VTV vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than IUSG's 10.18% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has underperformed IUSG with an annualized return of 12.78%, while IUSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.63% annualized return.
VTV
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 27.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
IUSG
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 29.29%
- 3Y*
- 25.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- 17.63%
VTV vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 14.29% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 10.18% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -28.81% | 31.26% | 32.65% | 30.62% | -0.79% | 27.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and IUSG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VTV and IUSG has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VTV vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
IUSG
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
VTV
IUSG
Healthcare
VTV
IUSG
Industrials
VTV
IUSG
Technology
VTV
IUSG
Consumer Defensive
VTV
IUSG
Energy
VTV
IUSG
Utilities
VTV
IUSG
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
IUSG
Communication Services
VTV
IUSG
Basic Materials
VTV
IUSG
Real Estate
VTV
IUSG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
IUSG
VTV vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTV | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.30 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 2.13 | +2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.04 | 8.79 | +7.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTV vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -63.41% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -13.07% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -22.28% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -32.21% | +15.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -32.35% | -4.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.37% | +4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -21.42% | +13.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 3.16% | -1.48% |
Volatility
VTV vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 3.34%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 6.20% | -2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.82% | 13.25% | -5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.38% | 16.46% | -6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 20.97% | -7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 20.46% | -3.78% |
VTV vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VTV and IUSG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTV vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than IUSG's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and IUSG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IUSG has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to VTV (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs IUSG's -63.41%.
On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.63% vs 12.78% for VTV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.63% return vs 12.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV and IUSG have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.49% for IUSG.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IUSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer