PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. GDXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 12.42%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.53% annualized return.


VTV

1D
0.25%
1M
2.67%
YTD
11.91%
6M
13.41%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
12.42%

GDXJ

1D
1.01%
1M
-19.25%
YTD
-10.70%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
50.65%
3Y*
42.13%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTV vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
11.91%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
-10.70%172.28%15.67%7.12%-14.53%-21.25%30.40%40.44%-11.02%8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and GDXJ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2009

0.23

The correlation between VTV and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (10 years) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTV vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTV
GDXJ

Financial Services

22.3%

-

Healthcare

14.5%

-

Industrials

14.0%

-

Technology

13.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.4%

-

Energy

8.1%

-

Utilities

5.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%

-

Communication Services

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

3.1%
100.0%

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Financial Services

VTV
22.3%
GDXJ

-

Healthcare

VTV
14.5%
GDXJ

-

Industrials

VTV
14.0%
GDXJ

-

Technology

VTV
13.4%
GDXJ

-

Consumer Defensive

VTV
9.4%
GDXJ

-

Energy

VTV
8.1%
GDXJ

-

Utilities

VTV
5.2%
GDXJ

-

Consumer Cyclical

VTV
4.0%
GDXJ

-

Communication Services

VTV
3.3%
GDXJ

-

Basic Materials

VTV
3.1%
GDXJ
100.0%

Real Estate

VTV
2.8%
GDXJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTV vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTVGDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.20

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

1.43

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.20

3.72

+11.49

VTV vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTVGDXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.00

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.39

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.26

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.05

+0.46

Drawdowns

VTV vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and GDXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVGDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-88.66%

+29.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-35.60%

+29.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-35.60%

+21.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-50.99%

+33.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

-57.77%

+20.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-34.94%

+33.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-60.48%

+52.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

13.67%

-11.99%

Volatility

VTV vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.65%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVGDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

17.66%

-15.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

42.71%

-35.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

50.84%

-40.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

41.34%

-27.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

44.15%

-27.47%

VTV vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTV vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than GDXJ's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.61%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.87%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXJ has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.42% vs 11.53% for GDXJ. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.42% return vs 11.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.

GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.

VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GDXJ is Gold. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.52% for GDXJ.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and GDXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer