VTV vs. AOR
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and AOR (iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while AOR is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S&P Target Risk Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.42%/yr vs 8.29%/yr for AOR. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AOR.
Performance
VTV vs. AOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than AOR's 5.83% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed AOR with an annualized return of 12.42%, while AOR has yielded a comparatively lower 8.29% annualized return.
VTV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
AOR
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 6.57%
- 1Y
- 17.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
VTV vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 11.91% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 5.83% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 11.42% | 18.91% | -5.82% | 15.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and AOR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2008 | 0.83 |
The correlation between VTV and AOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VTV vs. AOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
AOR
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
VTV
AOR
Healthcare
VTV
AOR
Industrials
VTV
AOR
Technology
VTV
AOR
Consumer Defensive
VTV
AOR
Energy
VTV
AOR
Utilities
VTV
AOR
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
AOR
Communication Services
VTV
AOR
Basic Materials
VTV
AOR
Real Estate
VTV
AOR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
AOR
VTV vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTV | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.37 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 2.58 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.20 | 11.20 | +4.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTV | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 1.98 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.63 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.78 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.68 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
VTV vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than AOR's maximum drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and AOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -24.44% | -34.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -6.64% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -9.77% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -21.72% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -22.95% | -13.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.98% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -3.47% | -4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.53% | +0.15% |
Volatility
VTV vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.65%, while iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 3.07% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.67% | 7.11% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 8.67% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 10.59% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 10.69% | +5.99% |
VTV vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than AOR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTV vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than AOR's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 2.51% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and AOR have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOR has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs AOR's -24.44%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.42% vs 8.29% for AOR. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.42% return vs 8.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AOR.
AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while AOR is Diversified Portfolio. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.15% for AOR.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and AOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer