VTR vs. CURB
VTR (Ventas, Inc.) and CURB (Curbline Properties Corp) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — VTR in REIT - Healthcare Facilities, CURB in REIT - Retail. Over the past year, VTR returned 28.55% vs 31.96% for CURB. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VTR vs. CURB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTR achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly lower than CURB's 26.70% return.
VTR
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 28.55%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 5.81%
CURB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 26.70%
- 6M
- 28.84%
- 1Y
- 31.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTR vs. CURB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VTR Ventas, Inc. | 3.55% | 35.09% | -6.37% |
CURB Curbline Properties Corp | 26.70% | 2.93% | 18.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTR and CURB is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
VTR:
$38.75B
CURB:
$3.08B
VTR:
$0.55
CURB:
$0.31
VTR:
144.46
CURB:
93.72
VTR:
4.13
CURB:
1.36
VTR:
6.13
CURB:
15.25
VTR:
2.95
CURB:
1.63
VTR:
$6.13B
CURB:
$201.87M
VTR:
-$261.17M
CURB:
$108.48M
VTR:
$2.45B
CURB:
$120.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTR vs. CURB — Risk / Return Rank
VTR
CURB
VTR vs. CURB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ventas, Inc. (VTR) and Curbline Properties Corp (CURB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTR | CURB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 3.36 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.00 | 7.77 | +1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTR | CURB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.61 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.02 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
VTR vs. CURB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTR drawdown since its inception was -83.38%, which is greater than CURB's maximum drawdown of -14.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTR and CURB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTR | CURB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.38% | -14.18% | -69.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.52% | -9.54% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.88% | -0.17% | -11.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.20% | -5.33% | -12.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 4.12% | -0.94% |
Volatility
VTR vs. CURB - Volatility Comparison
Ventas, Inc. (VTR) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to Curbline Properties Corp (CURB) at 4.87%. This indicates that VTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CURB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTR | CURB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.93% | 4.87% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 13.91% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.04% | 20.03% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 28.79% | -3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.77% | 28.79% | +5.98% |
Dividends
VTR vs. CURB - Dividend Comparison
VTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than CURB's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURB Curbline Properties Corp | 2.33% | 2.89% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTR Ventas, Inc. | 2.46% | 2.48% | 3.06% | 3.61% | 4.00% | 3.52% | 4.37% | 5.49% | 5.40% | 5.19% | 4.74% | 20.47% |
Financials
VTR vs. CURB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ventas, Inc. and Curbline Properties Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VTR vs. CURB - Profitability Comparison
VTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a gross profit of 655.41M and revenue of 1.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
CURB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curbline Properties Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 57.67M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
VTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported an operating income of 191.56M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
CURB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curbline Properties Corp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 57.67M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
VTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a net income of 55.91M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
CURB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curbline Properties Corp reported a net income of 3.56M and revenue of 57.67M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VTR and CURB have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTR has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to CURB (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTR dropped -83.38% vs CURB's -14.18%.
CURB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTR and CURB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer