CURB vs. CLILF
CURB (Curbline Properties Corp) and CLILF (CapitaLand Investment Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — CURB in REIT - Retail, CLILF in Real Estate - Services. Over the past year, CURB returned 30.45% vs 15.00% for CLILF. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CURB vs. CLILF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CURB achieves a 25.74% return, which is significantly higher than CLILF's 6.49% return.
CURB
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 25.74%
- 6M
- 24.62%
- 1Y
- 30.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLILF
- 1D
- -5.59%
- 1M
- -12.44%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 33.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- -6.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CURB vs. CLILF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CURB Curbline Properties Corp | 25.74% | 2.93% | 18.24% |
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 6.49% | -3.06% | -14.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CURB and CLILF is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
CURB:
$3.06B
CLILF:
$7.72B
CURB:
$0.31
CLILF:
$0.05
CURB:
93.01
CLILF:
40.59
CURB:
15.13
CLILF:
3.06
CURB:
1.61
CLILF:
0.61
CURB:
$201.87M
CLILF:
$2.91B
CURB:
$108.48M
CLILF:
$2.22B
CURB:
$120.31M
CLILF:
$153.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CURB vs. CLILF — Risk / Return Rank
CURB
CLILF
CURB vs. CLILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curbline Properties Corp (CURB) and CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CURB | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 0.52 | +2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 1.07 | +6.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CURB | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 0.24 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | -0.06 | +1.06 |
Drawdowns
CURB vs. CLILF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CURB drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum CLILF drawdown of -66.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURB and CLILF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CURB | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -66.07% | +51.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.54% | -29.26% | +19.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -53.74% | +53.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -44.05% | +38.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 14.09% | -9.97% |
Volatility
CURB vs. CLILF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Curbline Properties Corp (CURB) is 4.92%, while CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that CURB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CURB | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 10.69% | -5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 54.59% | -40.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 62.76% | -42.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 80.17% | -51.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 80.17% | -51.29% |
Dividends
CURB vs. CLILF - Dividend Comparison
CURB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than CLILF's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 3.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CURB Curbline Properties Corp | 2.34% | 2.89% | 1.08% |
Financials
CURB vs. CLILF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curbline Properties Corp and CapitaLand Investment Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CURB vs. CLILF - Profitability Comparison
CURB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curbline Properties Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 57.67M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CLILF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
CURB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curbline Properties Corp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 57.67M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CLILF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
CURB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curbline Properties Corp reported a net income of 3.56M and revenue of 57.67M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
CLILF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CURB and CLILF have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLILF has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to CURB (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURB dropped -14.18% vs CLILF's -66.07%.
CURB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CURB and CLILF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer