VTP vs. YCS
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - VTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. VTP charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
VTP vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.35% return.
VTP
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 30.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 23.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
VTP vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.18% | 2.46% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.35% | 18.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and YCS is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YCS
VTP vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTP | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTP vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -49.56% | +47.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | 0.00% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -19.88% | +19.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
VTP vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33% | 16.99% | -13.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.33% | 21.09% | -17.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.33% | 18.98% | -15.65% |
VTP vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTP vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.62% | 1.56% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTP and YCS have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
VTP has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
VTP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 1.00% for YCS.
Find the right allocation for VTP and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer