VTP vs. IGHG
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and IGHG (ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - VTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while IGHG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. VTP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IGHG.
Performance
VTP vs. IGHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than IGHG's 1.89% return.
VTP
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGHG
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 5.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 4.81%
VTP vs. IGHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.10% | 2.46% |
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 1.89% | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and IGHG is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. IGHG — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IGHG
VTP vs. IGHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTP | IGHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTP vs. IGHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum IGHG drawdown of -25.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and IGHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | IGHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -25.16% | +23.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.43% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -2.29% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility
VTP vs. IGHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | IGHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 3.41% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 5.02% | -1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 7.45% | -4.10% |
VTP vs. IGHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IGHG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTP vs. IGHG - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than IGHG's 5.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 5.13% | 5.14% | 5.06% | 4.99% | 3.55% | 2.50% | 2.79% | 3.48% | 4.13% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 3.65% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.62% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTP and IGHG have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IGHG.
IGHG has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 1.62% for VTP.
VTP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IGHG is Corporate Bonds. VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while IGHG tracks Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.30% for IGHG.
Find the right allocation for VTP and IGHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer