IGHG vs. AGG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG).
IGHG and AGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGHG is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2013. AGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2003. Both IGHG and AGG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGHG or AGG.
Key characteristics
| IGHG | AGG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.40% | 2.65% |
| 1Y Return | 11.09% | 9.31% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.97% | -2.21% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.56% | 0.10% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.70% | 1.55% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.69 | 1.40 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.84 | 2.06 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.55 | 1.25 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.29 | 0.54 |
| Martin Ratio | 20.66 | 5.12 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.55% | 1.64% |
| Daily Std Dev | 4.20% | 5.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.16% | -18.43% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGHG and AGG is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
IGHG vs. AGG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IGHG achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 2.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IGHG has outperformed AGG with an annualized return of 3.70%, while AGG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.55% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGHG vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGHG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.05% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGHG vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGHG vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison
IGHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than AGG's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 5.07% | 4.99% | 3.55% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 3.48% | 4.13% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 3.64% | 3.59% | 0.55% |
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.93% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.96% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.40% | 2.32% |
Drawdowns
IGHG vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGHG drawdown since its inception was -25.16%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGHG and AGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGHG vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) has a higher volatility of 1.87% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.68%. This indicates that IGHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.