VTP vs. IBII
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and IBII (iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5 while IBII tracks the ICE 2032 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBII.
Performance
VTP vs. IBII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than IBII's 0.97% return.
VTP
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBII
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTP vs. IBII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.10% | 2.46% |
IBII iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF | 0.97% | 2.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and IBII is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. IBII — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBII
VTP vs. IBII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTP | IBII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTP vs. IBII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum IBII drawdown of -4.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and IBII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | IBII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -4.65% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -1.30% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -1.12% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.63% | — |
Volatility
VTP vs. IBII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | IBII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 3.49% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 5.42% | -2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 5.42% | -2.07% |
VTP vs. IBII - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IBII's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTP vs. IBII - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than IBII's 4.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBII iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF | 4.08% | 4.80% | 4.76% | 1.10% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.62% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, VTP and IBII move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBII.
IBII has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 1.62% for VTP.
VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while IBII tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.10% for IBII.
Find the right allocation for VTP and IBII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer