PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTMFX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTMFX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTMFX achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 21.38% return. Over the past 10 years, VTMFX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.58% annualized return.


VTMFX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.06%
YTD
6.03%
6M
6.16%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
8.70%

NASDX

1D
0.47%
1M
10.94%
YTD
21.38%
6M
19.90%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
22.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTMFX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
6.03%11.28%12.17%15.55%-12.69%13.10%13.31%18.01%-1.40%12.61%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.38%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VTMFX and NASDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2000

0.89

The correlation between VTMFX and NASDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTMFX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTMFX
VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTMFX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTMFXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.46

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.65

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.40

14.16

+1.24

VTMFX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTMFX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTMFXNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

2.70

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.89

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

1.00

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.33

+0.52

Drawdowns

VTMFX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTMFX drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTMFX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTMFXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.49%

-83.16%

+54.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.38%

-11.90%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.61%

-22.71%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.40%

-35.33%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.87%

-35.33%

+13.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-34.37%

+30.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

3.06%

-1.94%

Volatility

VTMFX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) is 1.70%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that VTMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTMFXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

4.51%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.75%

12.19%

-7.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

16.10%

-9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.52%

23.06%

-14.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.12%

22.68%

-13.56%

VTMFX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTMFX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTMFX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

VTMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than NASDX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.98%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
2.10%2.14%2.08%1.94%1.85%1.38%1.72%2.05%2.22%2.00%2.13%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VTMFX and NASDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NASDX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to VTMFX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTMFX dropped -28.49% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTMFX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer