PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTIVX vs. MCSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTIVX vs. MCSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund (VTIVX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTIVX achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly lower than MCSIX's 24.31% return. Over the past 10 years, VTIVX has outperformed MCSIX with an annualized return of 11.32%, while MCSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.37% annualized return.


VTIVX

1D
0.26%
1M
4.06%
YTD
10.74%
6M
11.95%
1Y
25.85%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
9.46%
10Y*
11.32%

MCSIX

1D
1.12%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
24.31%
6M
25.37%
1Y
39.41%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
7.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTIVX vs. MCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTIVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund
10.74%20.01%13.68%19.72%-17.38%16.16%16.31%24.94%-7.89%19.16%
MCSIX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
24.31%18.47%5.08%-6.13%13.40%27.55%-0.02%7.79%-12.79%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VTIVX and MCSIX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between VTIVX and MCSIX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTIVX vs. MCSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTIVX
VTIVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VTIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

MCSIX
MCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTIVX vs. MCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund (VTIVX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTIVXMCSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

2.66

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

3.33

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.48

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

5.06

-1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.14

16.54

-2.40

VTIVX vs. MCSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTIVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the MCSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTIVX and MCSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTIVXMCSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.66

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.33

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.28

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.12

+0.43

Drawdowns

VTIVX vs. MCSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTIVX drawdown since its inception was -51.69%, smaller than the maximum MCSIX drawdown of -64.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTIVX and MCSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIVXMCSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.69%

-64.20%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-8.15%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.40%

-9.74%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-37.61%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.42%

-37.61%

+6.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.23%

+3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-33.29%

+26.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.50%

-0.63%

Volatility

VTIVX vs. MCSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund (VTIVX) is 3.18%, while MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that VTIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIVXMCSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

4.84%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.38%

13.70%

-5.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

15.93%

-5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

34.65%

-21.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.79%

26.03%

-11.24%

VTIVX vs. MCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTIVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSIX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTIVX vs. MCSIX - Dividend Comparison

VTIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than MCSIX's 12.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCSIX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
12.90%16.04%3.30%2.21%27.42%56.01%0.88%1.87%3.50%3.14%0.61%0.47%
VTIVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund
2.25%2.50%2.36%2.27%2.75%15.40%1.90%2.23%2.52%0.04%2.47%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTIVX and MCSIX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCSIX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to VTIVX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTIVX dropped -51.69% vs MCSIX's -64.20%.

MCSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTIVX and MCSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer