PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCSIX vs. BRCYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCSIX vs. BRCYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund (BRCYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSIX achieves a 19.61% return, which is significantly lower than BRCYX's 26.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MCSIX having a 7.39% annualized return and BRCYX not far ahead at 7.63%.


MCSIX

1D
-0.23%
1M
6.13%
6M
9.07%
YTD
19.61%
1Y
33.79%
3Y*
12.81%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
7.39%
ALL TIME*
2.40%

BRCYX

1D
-0.12%
1M
7.45%
6M
16.89%
YTD
26.65%
1Y
43.27%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
7.63%
ALL TIME*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MCSIX vs. BRCYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCSIX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
19.61%18.47%5.08%-6.13%13.40%27.55%-0.02%7.79%-12.79%3.65%
BRCYX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund
26.65%18.82%5.70%-3.15%7.94%19.54%7.89%4.49%-12.03%4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSIX and BRCYX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2010

0.87

The correlation between MCSIX and BRCYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCSIX vs. BRCYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MCSIX
MCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BRCYX
BRCYX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BRCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BRCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MCSIX vs. BRCYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund (BRCYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCSIXBRCYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.42

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

8.01

-0.19

MCSIX vs. BRCYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the BRCYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSIX and BRCYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCSIX vs. BRCYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSIX drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, which is greater than BRCYX's maximum drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSIX and BRCYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCSIXBRCYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.20%

-60.05%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.69%

-17.02%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-17.02%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.61%

-20.42%

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.61%

-38.09%

+0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-9.14%

+2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.02%

-27.04%

-5.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

5.13%

-1.13%

Volatility

MCSIX vs. BRCYX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund (BRCYX) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCSIXBRCYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.20%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

15.58%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

18.23%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.63%

15.76%

+18.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.03%

14.33%

+11.70%

MCSIX vs. BRCYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BRCYX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCSIX vs. BRCYX - Dividend Comparison

MCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.41%, more than BRCYX's 10.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRCYX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund
10.83%13.71%4.95%3.71%9.93%16.64%0.00%0.91%0.25%0.01%2.74%0.00%
MCSIX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
13.41%16.04%3.30%2.21%27.42%56.01%0.88%1.87%3.50%3.14%0.61%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MCSIX and BRCYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MCSIX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to BRCYX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSIX dropped -64.20% vs BRCYX's -60.05%.

BRCYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCSIX and BRCYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer