PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTI vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 15.23%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.


VTI

1D
1.68%
1M
2.70%
YTD
11.46%
6M
11.76%
1Y
28.40%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
15.23%

XLP

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.99%
YTD
10.66%
6M
8.80%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
7.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.46%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
10.66%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and XLP is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between VTI and XLP has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VTI vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTI
XLP

Technology

33.3%

-

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
1.0%

Industrials

9.5%

-

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
99.0%

Energy

3.8%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Basic Materials

2.0%

-

Technology

VTI
33.3%
XLP

-

Financial Services

VTI
11.9%
XLP

-

Communication Services

VTI
10.1%
XLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

VTI
9.8%
XLP
1.0%

Industrials

VTI
9.5%
XLP

-

Healthcare

VTI
9.1%
XLP

-

Consumer Defensive

VTI
4.7%
XLP
99.0%

Energy

VTI
3.8%
XLP

-

Utilities

VTI
2.7%
XLP

-

Real Estate

VTI
2.4%
XLP

-

Basic Materials

VTI
2.0%
XLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTIXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.12

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

0.88

+2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.35

1.70

+12.65

VTI vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTI vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-35.90%

-19.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-9.69%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-12.39%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-16.30%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-24.51%

-10.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-4.50%

+4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-7.06%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

5.02%

-3.04%

Volatility

VTI vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) have volatilities of 4.74% and 4.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

4.55%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

10.13%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

12.85%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

13.34%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

14.75%

+3.59%

VTI vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTI vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than XLP's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTI and XLP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to XLP (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs XLP's -35.90%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.23% vs 7.58% for XLP. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.23% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLP.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.08% for XLP.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer