VTI vs. MOAT
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 15.02%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for MOAT. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.
Performance
VTI vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 15.02%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.47% annualized return.
VTI
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 26.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
VTI vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.62% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.66% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and MOAT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012 | 0.88 |
The correlation between VTI and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VTI vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTI
MOAT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VTI
MOAT
Financial Services
VTI
MOAT
Communication Services
VTI
MOAT
Consumer Cyclical
VTI
MOAT
Industrials
VTI
MOAT
Healthcare
VTI
MOAT
Consumer Defensive
VTI
MOAT
Energy
VTI
MOAT
-
Utilities
VTI
MOAT
-
Real Estate
VTI
MOAT
Basic Materials
VTI
MOAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
MOAT
VTI vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTI | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.16 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 1.02 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 3.11 | +9.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTI vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and MOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -33.31% | -22.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -12.43% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -21.44% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -23.96% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -33.31% | -1.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -4.45% | +2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -3.83% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 4.06% | -2.07% |
Volatility
VTI vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.13%. This indicates that VTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 4.13% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 9.90% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 13.93% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 18.20% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 18.68% | -0.35% |
VTI vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTI vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than MOAT's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTI and MOAT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTI has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs MOAT's -33.31%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.02% vs 13.47% for MOAT. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.02% return vs 13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.
MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.03% for VTI.
VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.47% for MOAT.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTI and MOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer