PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. MFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTI vs. MFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly lower than MFG's 32.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTI having a 15.02% annualized return and MFG not far ahead at 15.72%.


VTI

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
9.62%
6M
9.69%
1Y
26.27%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
15.02%

MFG

1D
1.68%
1M
11.39%
YTD
32.24%
6M
31.34%
1Y
78.46%
3Y*
51.80%
5Y*
30.84%
10Y*
15.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. MFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
9.62%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%
MFG
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
32.24%54.60%47.85%26.14%17.09%2.40%-15.06%3.00%-17.58%3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and MFG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006

0.45

The correlation between VTI and MFG shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. MFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

MFG
MFG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFG Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. MFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTIMFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.40

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.11

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.52

8.25

+4.27

VTI vs. MFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the MFG Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and MFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTI vs. MFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, smaller than the maximum MFG drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and MFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIMFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-80.57%

+25.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-24.78%

+15.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-28.33%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-28.33%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-49.87%

+14.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-4.06%

+1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-60.82%

+52.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

9.31%

-7.32%

Volatility

VTI vs. MFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 4.50%, while Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIMFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

10.09%

-5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

24.20%

-14.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

30.69%

-18.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

29.66%

-12.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

26.49%

-8.16%

Dividends

VTI vs. MFG - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than MFG's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFG
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
0.96%2.68%3.20%3.73%4.34%2.76%2.71%0.00%0.00%1.86%3.77%3.10%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTI and MFG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFG has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to VTI (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs MFG's -80.57%.

MFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and MFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer