PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. EQL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTI vs. EQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly higher than EQL's 12.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed EQL with an annualized return of 14.87%, while EQL has yielded a comparatively lower 12.48% annualized return.


VTI

1D
1.87%
1M
3.27%
6M
12.73%
YTD
14.27%
1Y
24.07%
3Y*
21.13%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
14.87%
ALL TIME*
9.72%

EQL

1D
0.76%
1M
2.06%
6M
8.10%
YTD
12.64%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
12.48%
ALL TIME*
13.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.30M$2.87M$2.73M
$1.13B$1.17B$1.24B

VTI vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
14.27%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
12.64%13.09%16.44%16.87%-10.72%29.32%10.87%27.87%-6.12%18.37%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and EQL is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2009

0.92

The correlation between VTI and EQL shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTI vs. EQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTI
EQL

Technology

36.1%
10.2%

Financial Services

11.8%
9.1%

Industrials

10.2%
9.3%

Healthcare

9.7%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.6%

Communication Services

9.1%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
8.8%

Energy

3.2%
8.7%

Real Estate

2.3%
8.7%

Utilities

2.2%
9.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
8.0%

Technology

VTI
36.1%
EQL
10.2%

Financial Services

VTI
11.8%
EQL
9.1%

Industrials

VTI
10.2%
EQL
9.3%

Healthcare

VTI
9.7%
EQL
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VTI
9.4%
EQL
9.6%

Communication Services

VTI
9.1%
EQL
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

VTI
4.3%
EQL
8.8%

Energy

VTI
3.2%
EQL
8.7%

Real Estate

VTI
2.3%
EQL
8.7%

Utilities

VTI
2.2%
EQL
9.4%

Basic Materials

VTI
1.9%
EQL
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EQL
EQL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTI vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTIEQLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.10

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

12.14

-0.46

VTI vs. EQL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the EQL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and EQL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTI vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than EQL's maximum drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and EQL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIEQLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-35.65%

-19.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-6.19%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-15.07%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-19.24%

-6.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-35.65%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-3.23%

-4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.58%

+0.49%

Volatility

VTI vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 2.39%. This indicates that VTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIEQLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

2.39%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

7.12%

+3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

9.48%

+3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

14.52%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

16.50%

+1.82%

VTI vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTI vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than EQL's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
1.33%1.73%1.78%1.96%2.14%1.69%2.29%1.95%2.39%1.97%2.89%2.07%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTI and EQL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to EQL (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs EQL's -35.65%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 14.87% vs 12.48% for EQL. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 14.87% return vs 12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.

EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.02% for VTI.

VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.27% for EQL.

EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and EQL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer