VTI vs. EEMV
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 15.23%/yr vs 7.04%/yr for EEMV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EEMV.
Performance
VTI vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly lower than EEMV's 20.09% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 15.23%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.04% annualized return.
VTI
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- 1Y
- 28.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.94%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
EEMV
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 20.09%
- 6M
- 21.21%
- 1Y
- 27.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.04%
VTI vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.46% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 20.09% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -5.81% | 27.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and EEMV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.68 |
The correlation between VTI and EEMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VTI vs. EEMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTI
EEMV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VTI
EEMV
Financial Services
VTI
EEMV
Communication Services
VTI
EEMV
Consumer Cyclical
VTI
EEMV
Industrials
VTI
EEMV
Healthcare
VTI
EEMV
Consumer Defensive
VTI
EEMV
Energy
VTI
EEMV
Utilities
VTI
EEMV
Real Estate
VTI
EEMV
Basic Materials
VTI
EEMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
EEMV
VTI vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTI | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.39 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.03 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | 10.90 | +3.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTI vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and EEMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -31.56% | -23.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -9.22% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -12.47% | -6.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -21.90% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -31.56% | -3.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | 0.00% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -7.96% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.56% | -0.58% |
Volatility
VTI vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 4.74%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 8.16% | -3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 13.51% | -3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 14.67% | -1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 12.22% | +5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 13.99% | +4.35% |
VTI vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTI vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than EEMV's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.07% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTI and EEMV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMV has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to VTI (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs EEMV's -31.56%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.23% vs 7.04% for EEMV. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.23% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EEMV.
EEMV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.
VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EEMV is Asia Pacific Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.25% for EEMV.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTI and EEMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer