VTI vs. CAIQ
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while CAIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CAIQ.
Performance
VTI vs. CAIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly lower than CAIQ's 12.96% return.
VTI
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- 1Y
- 28.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.94%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
CAIQ
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI vs. CAIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.46% | 3.36% |
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 12.96% | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and CAIQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. CAIQ — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
CAIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTI vs. CAIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTI | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTI vs. CAIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than CAIQ's maximum drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and CAIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -9.06% | -46.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.52% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -1.70% | -6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | — | — |
Volatility
VTI vs. CAIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 13.91% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 13.91% | +3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 13.91% | +4.43% |
VTI vs. CAIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CAIQ's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTI vs. CAIQ - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than CAIQ's 8.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 8.50% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTI and CAIQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.
CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.50%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.
VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CAIQ is Nasdaq-100. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while CAIQ tracks MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.74% for CAIQ.
Find the right allocation for VTI and CAIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer