VTI vs. AFOS
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, VTI returned 23.02% vs 83.17% for AFOS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
VTI vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 8.90% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 33.60% return.
VTI
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- 8.90%
- 6M
- 7.43%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
AFOS
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 33.60%
- 6M
- 31.56%
- 1Y
- 83.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 8.90% | 12.97% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 33.60% | 37.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and AFOS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
AFOS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTI vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTI | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.45 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTI vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -11.52% | -43.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -11.52% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -2.33% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -1.43% | -6.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | — | — |
Volatility
VTI vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 21.58% | -8.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 21.58% | -4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 21.58% | -3.27% |
VTI vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTI vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTI and AFOS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, AFOS leads with 83.17% vs 23.02% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AFOS has performed better with a 83.17% return vs 23.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for VTI and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer