PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTI vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 33.00% return.


VTI

1D
1.87%
1M
3.27%
6M
12.73%
YTD
14.27%
1Y
24.07%
3Y*
21.13%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
14.87%
ALL TIME*
9.72%

AFOS

1D
2.18%
1M
1.37%
6M
19.61%
YTD
33.00%
1Y
68.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
72.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$514.50K$483.29K$468.04K
$1.13B$1.17B$1.24B

VTI vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTI and AFOS is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.83

The correlation between VTI and AFOS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AFOS
AFOS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AFOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFOS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AFOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFOS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTI vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTIAFOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

5.88

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

22.08

-10.40

VTI vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the AFOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and AFOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTI vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-11.80%

-43.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-11.80%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.77%

+2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-1.81%

-6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

3.13%

-1.06%

Volatility

VTI vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 4.13%, while ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) has a volatility of 8.72%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIAFOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

8.72%

-4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

19.38%

-8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

23.24%

-10.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

22.42%

-4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

22.42%

-4.10%

VTI vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTI vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.22%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTI and AFOS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFOS has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to VTI (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs AFOS's -11.80%.

On 1-year performance, AFOS leads with 68.95% vs 24.07% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AFOS has performed better with a 68.95% return vs 24.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.45% for AFOS.

AFOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer