PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTHRX vs. DFQTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTHRX vs. DFQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTHRX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than DFQTX's 11.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VTHRX has underperformed DFQTX with an annualized return of 8.89%, while DFQTX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.06% annualized return.


VTHRX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.00%
YTD
7.80%
6M
8.65%
1Y
19.60%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
8.89%

DFQTX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.97%
YTD
11.64%
6M
12.56%
1Y
29.45%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
14.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTHRX vs. DFQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTHRX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
7.80%16.25%10.43%16.24%-16.28%11.37%14.11%21.08%-5.85%15.24%
DFQTX
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I
11.64%15.99%20.27%21.88%-14.21%28.46%15.72%29.41%-9.65%18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VTHRX and DFQTX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2006

0.95

The correlation between VTHRX and DFQTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTHRX vs. DFQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTHRX
VTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DFQTX
DFQTX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DFQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DFQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTHRX vs. DFQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTHRXDFQTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.59

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.54

3.65

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.46

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.46

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.41

15.22

-1.81

VTHRX vs. DFQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the DFQTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTHRX and DFQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTHRXDFQTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.59

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.73

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.77

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.51

-0.01

Drawdowns

VTHRX vs. DFQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTHRX drawdown since its inception was -49.57%, smaller than the maximum DFQTX drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHRX and DFQTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTHRXDFQTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.57%

-59.35%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.56%

-8.47%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-19.71%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-22.64%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.86%

-37.21%

+12.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-7.78%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.92%

-0.43%

Volatility

VTHRX vs. DFQTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) is 2.60%, while DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that VTHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTHRXDFQTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

2.93%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

8.90%

-2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.09%

11.69%

-3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

16.99%

-6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.26%

18.27%

-7.01%

VTHRX vs. DFQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTHRX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DFQTX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTHRX vs. DFQTX - Dividend Comparison

VTHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than DFQTX's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFQTX
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I
0.96%1.06%1.15%1.74%4.43%4.74%1.29%3.50%2.84%1.97%1.80%3.78%
VTHRX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
3.74%4.03%3.63%2.59%2.53%17.56%2.56%2.38%2.71%0.06%2.38%3.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTHRX and DFQTX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFQTX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to VTHRX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHRX dropped -49.57% vs DFQTX's -59.35%.

DFQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTHRX and DFQTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer