VTHR vs. FCNKX

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

VTHR (Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF) and FCNKX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both funds - VTHR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index, while FCNKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. VTHR is passively managed, while FCNKX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTHR returned 14.91%/yr vs 18.32%/yr for FCNKX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTHR charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FCNKX.

Performance

VTHR vs. FCNKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VTHR having a 10.64% return and FCNKX slightly lower at 10.47%. Over the past 10 years, VTHR has underperformed FCNKX with an annualized return of 14.91%, while FCNKX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return.

VTHR

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 10.64%
• 6M: 10.64%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: 20.23%
• 5Y*: 11.95%
• 10Y*: 14.91%

FCNKX

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 10.47%
• 1Y: 21.72%
• 3Y*: 26.83%
• 5Y*: 14.95%
• 10Y*: 18.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTHR vs. FCNKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF	10.64%	16.99%	23.57%	25.92%	-19.20%	25.49%	20.93%	30.82%	-5.65%	21.06%
FCNKX Fidelity Contrafund	10.47%	21.88%	36.08%	39.50%	-27.44%	24.66%	32.50%	30.18%	-2.27%	32.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VTHR and FCNKX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.88

The correlation between VTHR and FCNKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VTHR vs. FCNKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTHR

VTHR Risk / Return Rank: 63
VTHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VTHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
VTHR Omega Ratio Rank: 60
VTHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VTHR Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FCNKX

FCNKX Risk / Return Rank: 34
FCNKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FCNKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FCNKX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FCNKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FCNKX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTHR vs. FCNKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VTHR	FCNKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.35	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	1.91	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.25	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	1.82	+0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.21	7.46	+3.74

VTHR vs. FCNKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTHR Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the FCNKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTHR and FCNKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VTHR vs. FCNKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, smaller than the maximum FCNKX drawdown of -46.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and FCNKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTHR	FCNKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.61%	-46.44%	+11.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-11.29%	+2.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.36%	-19.73%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.06%	-31.77%	+6.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.61%	-31.77%	-2.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-0.96%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-7.28%	+3.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	2.74%	-0.72%

Volatility

VTHR vs. FCNKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) is 4.93%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNKX) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that VTHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTHR	FCNKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.93%	6.81%	-1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	12.05%	-1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.84%	15.19%	-2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.40%	19.33%	-1.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.83%	19.69%	-1.86%

VTHR vs. FCNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTHR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNKX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

VTHR vs. FCNKX - Dividend Comparison

VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FCNKX's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNKX Fidelity Contrafund	4.21%	5.18%	4.28%	4.31%	13.69%	10.77%	8.00%	4.15%	9.14%	6.09%	3.92%	4.47%
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF	1.03%	1.08%	1.19%	1.47%	1.52%	1.16%	1.37%	1.65%	1.89%	1.63%	1.82%	1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTHR and FCNKX in my portfolio?

VTHR and FCNKX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VTHR or FCNKX?

FCNKX has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to VTHR (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs FCNKX's -46.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.