VTHR vs. EBI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VTHR (Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF) and EBI (Longview Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. VTHR is passively managed, while EBI is actively managed. Over the past year, VTHR returned 23.90% vs 30.46% for EBI. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTHR charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EBI.

Performance

VTHR vs. EBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTHR achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than EBI's 13.70% return.

VTHR

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -0.78%
• YTD: 8.70%
• 6M: 7.51%
• 1Y: 23.90%
• 3Y*: 20.48%
• 5Y*: 11.91%
• 10Y*: 15.06%

EBI

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 13.70%
• 6M: 12.56%
• 1Y: 30.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTHR vs. EBI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF	8.70%	15.50%
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	13.70%	15.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VTHR and EBI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	0.93

The correlation between VTHR and EBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VTHR vs. EBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTHR

VTHR Risk / Return Rank: 59
VTHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
VTHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VTHR Omega Ratio Rank: 56
VTHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
VTHR Martin Ratio Rank: 68

EBI

EBI Risk / Return Rank: 84
EBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EBI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EBI Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTHR vs. EBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VTHR	EBI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.46	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	3.37	-0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.43	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	4.32	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.99	17.50	-5.51

VTHR vs. EBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTHR Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the EBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTHR and EBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VTHR vs. EBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, which is greater than EBI's maximum drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and EBI.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTHR	EBI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.61%	-17.05%	-17.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-7.09%	-1.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-1.43%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-2.03%	-2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	1.75%	+0.25%

Volatility

VTHR vs. EBI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) at 4.03%. This indicates that VTHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTHR	EBI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.78%	4.03%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.12%	9.27%	+0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.87%	12.49%	+0.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	17.88%	-0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.86%	17.88%	-0.02%

VTHR vs. EBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTHR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EBI's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VTHR vs. EBI - Dividend Comparison

VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than EBI's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	0.92%	1.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF	1.05%	1.08%	1.19%	1.47%	1.52%	1.16%	1.37%	1.65%	1.89%	1.63%	1.82%	1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTHR and EBI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, VTHR and EBI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VTHR or EBI?

VTHR has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to EBI (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs EBI's -17.05%.

Which ETF is better, VTHR or EBI?

On 1-year performance, EBI leads with 30.46% vs 23.90% for VTHR. On fees, VTHR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, EBI has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VTHR or EBI?

Over the 1-year period, EBI has performed better with a 30.46% return vs 23.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VTHR or EBI?

VTHR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for EBI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VTHR or EBI?

VTHR has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.92% for EBI.

What is the main difference between VTHR and EBI?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Longview. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTHR and 0.24% for EBI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.