PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTG vs. IBTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTG vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VTG

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.11%
6M
-0.79%
YTD
-0.78%
1Y
1.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.14%

IBTF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
1.44%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$2.81M$3.14M$2.90M

VTG vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTG and IBTF is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTG vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTG
VTG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTF
IBTF Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
IBTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTF Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTF Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTG vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTGIBTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-19.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

7.18

-6.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

40.36

-39.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

261.59

-259.97

VTG vs. IBTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the IBTF Sharpe Ratio of 6.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTG and IBTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTG vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTG drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, smaller than the maximum IBTF drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTG and IBTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTGIBTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-10.45%

+7.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.89%

-0.04%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

0.00%

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-3.24%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

0.01%

+1.21%

Volatility

VTG vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) at 0.00%. This indicates that VTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTGIBTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

0.00%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

0.06%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.49%

0.29%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.51%

2.35%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.51%

2.53%

+0.98%

VTG vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTG vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison

VTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than IBTF's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBTF
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF
1.37%3.83%4.32%4.03%1.93%0.57%0.59%
VTG
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
3.31%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTG and IBTF have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTG has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to IBTF (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTG dropped -2.89% vs IBTF's -10.45%.

On 1-year performance, IBTF leads with 1.44% vs 1.06% for VTG. On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IBTF has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBTF has performed better with a 1.44% return vs 1.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTF.

VTG has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.37% for IBTF.

VTG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index, while IBTF tracks ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTG and 0.07% for IBTF.

IBTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.02 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTG and IBTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer